harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [BootJVM] jvm/src/opcode.c patch
Date Tue, 01 Nov 2005 12:38:30 GMT
what about "exit()" ? :)

geir

On Oct 31, 2005, at 7:25 PM, bootjvm@earthlink.net wrote:

>
> Jean-Frederic,
>
> This is the area of the code I am working on
> fast and furious.  I have used this macro as
> a place holder to say, "Stop the world!  It
> doesn't work yet!"  I am hoping to get all
> of these STUB instances removed in the next
> week or so when I get all the code done that
> it stubs out.  Any change here will be removed
> anyway because the code will be implemented.
> If you want to do this locally, it might mean
> something to you, but overall, the need for it
> will be going away soon.
>
> Dan Lydick
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean-frederic Clere <jfclere@telefonica.net>
> Sent: Oct 31, 2005 4:47 PM
> To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [BootJVM] jvm/src/opcode.c patch
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose the following patch:
> +++
> jfclere@jfcexpert:~/harmony/enhanced/trunk/sandbox/contribs/bootjvm/ 
> bootJVM>
> svn diff jvm/src/opcode.c
> Index: jvm/src/opcode.c
> ===================================================================
> --- jvm/src/opcode.c    (revision 329310)
> +++ jvm/src/opcode.c    (working copy)
> @@ -985,7 +985,7 @@
>   * creating better readability of the code.
>   */
>
> -static void dummy1(void) { char *p, *dummy2; dummy2 = p; dummy1(); }
> +static void dummy1(void) { void (*p)()=NULL; p(); }
>  #define STUB { dummy1(); }
>
>  switch(opcode)
> +++
> The idea is to core ASAP when we reach a not yet supported opcode, any
> comment?
>
> Cheers
>
> Jean-Frederic
>
>
>
>
> Dan Lydick
>

-- 
Geir Magnusson Jr                                  +1-203-665-6437
geirm@apache.org



Mime
View raw message