harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Leo Simons <m...@leosimons.com>
Subject [mail@leosimons.com: Re: Small problems building under cygwin]
Date Sat, 22 Oct 2005 08:47:25 GMT
Dan has an autoresponder. I refuse to use those buggers, especially when they're
used by people that don't harvest hundreds of mbox files to fill 'em up properly!*
And even more especially when I need to go to a web page to get past them.

Hence, to the list...

- Leo "die autoresponders die" Simons

* http://incubator.apache.org/mail/harmony-dev/

----- Forwarded message from Leo Simons <mail@leosimons.com> -----

From: Leo Simons <mail@leosimons.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 10:29:19 +0200
Subject: Re: Small problems building under cygwin
To: Apache Harmony Bootstrap JVM <bootjvm@earthlink.net>

Dan,

could you fix your mailer to have the from address as an actual person (eg
your name). I'm not used to getting emails from a JVM :-)

cheers!

Leo

On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 11:51:03AM -0400, Apache Harmony Bootstrap JVM wrote:
> 
> Dalibor,
> 
> I'd like to see what you could recommend.
> I concentrated on getting the source going
> with minimal infrastructure and with the
> anticipation of adding this kind of support.
> Please check out the latest bootJVM source
> and tinker with it.  I'd like to see what you
> come up with.
> 
> 
> Dan Lydick
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dalibor Topic <robilad@kaffe.org>
> Sent: Oct 21, 2005 11:38 AM
> To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Small problems building under cygwin
> 
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 01:08:34PM -0200, Rodrigo Kumpera wrote:
> > Dan,
> > 
> > To generate a binary that doesn't depend on cygwin shared lib, for
> > that I use the following combination of flags "-mno-cygwin 
> > -Wl,--add-stdcall-alias", the first one is pretty obvious, the second
> > is result of google'ing for a working solution, as I could not make it
> > work without this flag.
> 
> Is there something that speaks against using autotools for all that?
> 
> I've written autotools setups that work with gcc, MSVC, etc, across
> CygWin, OS X, various Unix variants, GNU/Linux, etc, and found the
> underlying tools to have evolved nicely for that in the last few years,
> offer some pretty neat features (cross-compiling for windows from
> GNU/Linux for example), and most importantly, take care of the whole
> platform specific linker flag zoo accross all sorts of operating system
> and toolchain combinations.
> 
> cheers,
> dalibor topic
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Dan Lydick

----- End forwarded message -----

Mime
View raw message