harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Code into SVN, not the WIKI (Re: [arch] VMCore / Component Model)
Date Tue, 20 Sep 2005 06:40:11 GMT

On Sep 20, 2005, at 3:07 AM, David Tanzer wrote:

> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>
>> Lets not store code in the wiki, but rather SVN.  There's no  
>> control  on a  WIKI, so we have no clue what it is or really where  
>> it came from.
>>
>
> I totally agree with that, I just didn't know if I have SVN write  
> access
> and how we structure the repository. I guess it would be good to  
> set up
> a "playground" or "sandbox" where we can play around with prototypes
> like the one I've provided.

This will be a way to help work that out.

>
>
>> As you know, we are being very careful about code pedigree for  
>> all  sorts of good reasons.  If you would like to get this code  
>> into SVN  so others can start tweaking and playing, we should do  
>> that.
>> 1) To get started, first look at the Authorized Contributor   
>> Questionnaire (ACQ)
>>  http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/auth_cont_quest.html
>> or
>>  http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/auth_cont_quest.txt
>> and fill out a copy, print it, and sign it.  Fax to
>>   +1 203 665 6400
>> (that's my fax #).
>> 2) Fill out an ICLA as required by part IV of the ACQ above
>>   http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt
>> print it, and sign it.  Fax to same number.
>>
>
> I have sent both documents via snail mail to
>
> Apache Software Foundation
> 1901 Munsey Drive,
> Forest Hill, MD 21050-2747
> U.S.A.
>
> should I still fax it to you anyway?

Yes.

>
>
>> Assuming that all is well with the ACQ, this means that we can  
>> accept  the code you have put in the WIKI into SVN for people to  
>> start  playing with.  You will have to add the code to a JIRA  
>> entry for the  project, so you can definitively offer it under the  
>> Apache license.
>> Note that we are going to be testing the contribution process that  
>> we  have thought out, so please be patient :)
>>
>
> Sure, no problem. I just thought we should start talking about code
> rather than abstract ideas.

That's perfect.

>
> Regards, David.
>
>
>> geir
>> On Sep 16, 2005, at 3:47 PM, David Tanzer wrote:
>> [Snip]
>>
>
>

-- 
Geir Magnusson Jr                                  +1-203-665-6437
geirm@apache.org



Mime
View raw message