harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From acoli...@apache.org
Subject Re: [vote] Accept JIRA contribution HARMONY-5 : David Tanzer's proof-of-concept component model
Date Thu, 29 Sep 2005 15:19:51 GMT
+1 code is good.

Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> 
> On Sep 29, 2005, at 10:24 AM, Peter Edworthy wrote:
> 
>> 0 - Not got time to check the code at the moment
>>
>>
>>>>> 2) I normally would put a 3 day review period, but this code is  small
>>>>> and I want to use this to test the process
>>>>>
>>
>> Can we go for an any objections version then ?
> 
> 
> I don't understand the question.  If there are objections, feel free  to 
> state.
> 
> Note that this isn't a vote on making a technology decision, but only  a 
> vote on whether or not we want to bring this code into our svn  
> repository.  I'm sorry I wasn't clear about that.
> 
> Again - this is about us bringing the code in, not making a  commitment 
> to use it in the project, or any judgement about it's  technical 
> feasability or usefulness.  that's a broader discussion.
> 
> 
>>
>> Or prohaps only email Geir?
> 
> 
> Anything that is discussion about the technology should be on the dev  
> list.  Any concerns that one would be uncomfortable discussing in  
> public that are relevant to the project as a whole should go to  
> harmony-ppmc, and if it's a personal issue - maybe you wish to call  me 
> a putz or something - either personal or /dev/null :)
> 
> geir
> 
> 
>>
>> Just seems like a lot of mail
>>
>> Pete
>>
>>
> 


-- 
Andrew C. Oliver
SuperLink Software, Inc.

Java to Excel using POI
http://www.superlinksoftware.com/services/poi
Commercial support including features added/implemented, bugs fixed.


Mime
View raw message