harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dasgupta, Rana" <rana.dasgu...@intel.com>
Subject Re: [arch] JIT interfaces
Date Wed, 24 Aug 2005 14:55:14 GMT
Steve Liao wrote:


> We cache the stack map info in the VM.  VM only handles the storage,

> but JIT controls the interpretation.  The rationale is that we want to

> let JIT focus on compilation, not on storage.  However, since JIT

> controls the interpretation, unified format on stack map is not

> required.  It may be beneficial for multiple JITs to agree on a

> format.  


The format of the opaque storage (in the VM) may not need unification
since the only a specific JIT will interpret it. However, as it is
likely that there will be several JITs hosted by a VM, it may be useful
to try to attain a common format for the interpreted structure that the
JITs will hand to the VM.








  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message