harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tom <...@gatewide.com>
Subject Re: [arch] Modular JVM component diagram
Date Fri, 19 Aug 2005 22:15:47 GMT

thanks for your link, seems like APR is the way to go.

Just one more thing: Instead of just having an abstraction layer, would 
it be possible to give our solution a little finer granularity right 
from the start ?
E.g. define a part of this layer so that only this part is required on a 
target to get the JVM to run. This will help to use Harmony with 
different bootpaths later on. For example, the VM will not require 
libraries for X-Path and database operations, or will it?  (They seem to 
be required to run libapr0 in your link)


Joerg Wendland wrote:
> *unlurk*
> Hi,
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 12:15:40AM -0700, Tom wrote:
>>I like the APR idea, but still would like to evaluate how feasible it 
>>will be to port whatever we chose as the OAL to various embedded 
>>platforms, in particular ARM, PowerPC and MIPS.
> Es you can for example see at [0] APR compiles, runs and is supported on
> these architectures plus nine others.
> Cheers,
>   Jörg
> [0] http://packages.debian.org/unstable/net/libapr0

View raw message