harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [arch] VM Interface
Date Mon, 06 Jun 2005 01:25:28 GMT

On Jun 5, 2005, at 10:06 PM, Craig Blake wrote:

> One potential use is for companies (and individuals) to work around  
> particular performance limitations and bugs in the Sun VM while  
> keeping the libraries they know inside and out.  I imagine that  
> could become common if Harmony ends up being as modular as we all  
> hope.
>
> I am curious as to how much of the standard libraries would be  
> rendered non-functional without the VM specific classes from Sun,  
> however.

Agreed.  But there is a reasonable argument to be made that it's in  
Sun's interest too to see a common interface/bridge/foo between the  
VM and class library, so lets not count them out of this.  This is a  
long project, and it's still early :)

geir

>
> Craig Blake
>
> On Jun 5, 2005, at 5:32 PM, Peter Donald wrote:
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> It seems like there is a little bit of heat being generated by  
>> this topic due to confusion. While Geir has not actually stated  
>> this anywhere I assume that the reason that he is advocating for a  
>> VM interface that is independent of GNU Classpath is because he  
>> has plans to interoperate with other class libraries.
>>
>> I assume that if the Harmony JVM gets half as good as is hoped  
>> there will be companys who want to adopt the JVM but continue to  
>> use Suns class library so that differences in libraries don't hurt  
>> their customers.
>>
>> Consider IBM - There are a few people here (both active and  
>> lurkers) that are IBMers. They have publicly showed support for an  
>> open source JVM on numerous occasions and I am sure they would  
>> benefit considerably (as would Harmony) if this project was to get  
>> to that stage. However I suspect that it is likely that they want  
>> to stick with a derivative of Suns rt.jar for the moment. The  
>> reason being that their customers do not want to be exposed to  
>> differences between rt.jar and GNU Classpath. Given that IBM has  
>> already re-written large chunks of the JVM I suspect that over  
>> time they may move piecemeal to an OSS class library - at a pace  
>> at which they can verify it matches Suns behaviour.
>>
>> Another possibility would be the people from Brazil who are  
>> starting their own JVM and I would not be surprised if at some  
>> point someone wants to reimplement the class library using with a  
>> ASL/MIT or other license with fewer restrictions.
>>
>> I could be wrong but I guess the idea is to keep the options open  
>> and encourage collaboration with both big buisness and other OSS  
>> projects.
>>
>>
>> ---
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Peter Donald
>> *------------------------------------------------*
>> | You can't wake a person who is pretending      |
>> |       to be asleep. -Navajo Proverb.           |
>> *------------------------------------------------*
>>
>>
>>
>
>

-- 
Geir Magnusson Jr                                  +1-203-665-6437
geirm@apache.org



Mime
View raw message