Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 45257 invoked from network); 18 May 2005 02:17:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 May 2005 02:17:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 10202 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2005 20:38:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 10154 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2005 20:38:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 10118 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2005 20:38:22 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of stustill@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.206 as permitted sender) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (HELO wproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.184.206) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2005 13:38:21 -0700 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so2143217wra for ; Tue, 17 May 2005 13:38:09 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=QlV1i8pO0CqBi2YvVrOsnhQY4mcV3noP39tOZx67gqnF1baMcwfA6Q0EvT328U1e1LGNxIyQA8vsuzVnmLlW5RIIWVTTuLDB/tGIs1TQOOlvrV7ukB2c9mhMpRKkXhABrfbx6o+x4vmRDGrZ9DHmtinohwwAO8ly8RvJjSXdvqI= Received: by 10.54.13.77 with SMTP id 77mr4589134wrm; Tue, 17 May 2005 13:38:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.6? ([81.154.90.79]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id d74sm1078390wra.2005.05.17.13.38.07; Tue, 17 May 2005 13:38:09 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v730) In-Reply-To: References: <428439D6.5080709@anu.edu.au> <4288C19E.4000109@algroup.co.uk> <8ed7339005051613227e166b04@mail.gmail.com> <42899447.6080307@aiqa.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <53DB4F00-D6BB-4D86-B5F0-131A250BEA26@gmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Stuart Still Subject: Re: Developing Harmony Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 21:37:51 +0100 To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.730) X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N It is just not as popular as the others. If pascal was used, there would be an awful lot of people unable to make contributions until they learned pascal. I think the real question is what features could pascal provide that would make it a better choice than the more popular choice of C/C++. Regards Stuart On 17 May 2005, at 18:54, Bryce Leo wrote: > Now don't go too crazy for my suggesting this, but why not pascal? If > we're considering C as it is this really isn't a terrible suggestion. > I know it's fallen out of favor with most of you guys but it compiles > quickly and supports a good number of operating systems and types of > hardware, like arm and AMD64 (referencing Free Pascal that is). I'm > betting that you guys won't like it but I think the option should be > listed. > > Opinions? > > ~Bryce Leo > > > --Veritas Vos Liberabis-- >