Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 81731 invoked from network); 11 May 2005 09:21:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 May 2005 09:21:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 70254 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2005 09:25:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 70204 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2005 09:25:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 70150 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2005 09:25:09 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: 217.155.92.109 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of ben@algroup.co.uk) Received: from mail.links.org (HELO mail.links.org) (217.155.92.109) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2005 02:25:09 -0700 Received: from [193.133.15.218] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.links.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E07F33C3D for ; Wed, 11 May 2005 10:21:26 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4281CE96.4000407@algroup.co.uk> Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 10:21:26 +0100 From: Ben Laurie User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Java References: <4281779C.8090600@anu.edu.au> <64779.196.8.104.31.1115801188.squirrel@196.8.104.31> In-Reply-To: <64779.196.8.104.31.1115801188.squirrel@196.8.104.31> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Matthew French wrote: > HOWEVER: If we go for the modular design, I see no reason why it will not > be possible to implement a VM running under Java. A VM for Mono/.Net would > also be an excellent idea. I see the concept as similar to User Mode > Linux, or VMWare. I'm very much in favour of the idea that modules can be in the language of your choice... -- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/ "There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff