Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v728)
In-Reply-To: <bc89fc25050517200921a3b4af@mail.gmail.com>
References: <428439D6.5080709@anu.edu.au>
 <m3ll6fwqn5.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <4288C19E.4000109@algroup.co.uk>
 <8ed7339005051613227e166b04@mail.gmail.com> <42899447.6080307@aiqa.com>
 <bc89fc2505051710547c7ffb1a@mail.gmail.com> <428A58DB.4020000@apache.org>
 <bc89fc25050517200921a3b4af@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <27780347-6B8F-4C3F-A2C9-22CC957288D4@apache.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Geir Magnusson Jr." <geirm@apache.org>
Subject: Re: Developing Harmony
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 03:08:13 -0400
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org


On May 17, 2005, at 11:09 PM, Bryce Leo wrote:

>> We are *NOT* going to be writing a JVM from scratch, we are open for
>> donations.
>>
>
> So why wasn't this cleared up from the start? Why state steadfastly
> that it was open and plausible. Ambiguity wastes time, obviously,
> maybe the Apache "moderators" (for lack of a better word) should go
> and list what is probably plausible and probably not plausible for the
> suggested implementation of the jvm, libraries etc.

I actually don't see why anything is off the table.  If we decide to  
write something from scratch, we do it.

I don't really want to (being lazy... :)

geir

-- 
Geir Magnusson Jr                                  +1-203-665-6437
geirm@apache.org