Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 81595 invoked from network); 20 May 2005 18:25:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 May 2005 18:25:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 56741 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2005 18:25:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 56686 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2005 18:25:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 56662 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2005 18:25:20 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from chi.mobile-health-diary.com (HELO chi.mobile-health-diary.com) (128.241.244.71) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Fri, 20 May 2005 11:25:19 -0700 Received: (qmail 30166 invoked from network); 20 May 2005 18:25:13 -0000 Received: from ool-43560634.dyn.optonline.net (HELO ?10.0.1.44?) (geir@67.86.6.52) by b014.internal.mobile-health-diary.com with SMTP; 20 May 2005 18:25:13 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v728) In-Reply-To: <20050520023450.4A3B2202153@nxmail.numerix.com> References: <20050520023450.4A3B2202153@nxmail.numerix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <1AC67C93-3C1A-47AD-B751-5FA607CEA1A7@apache.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: "Geir Magnusson Jr." Subject: Re: timeframe for mid-level decissions Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 06:39:59 -0400 To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.728) X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On May 19, 2005, at 10:34 PM, Renaud BECHADE wrote: > > > =EF=BC=9E=46rom the llvm web site: "LLVM does not currently support = garbage > =EF=BC=9Ecollection of multi-threaded programs or GC-safe points other = than > =EF=BC=9Efunction calls, but these will be added in the future as = there is > =EF=BC=9Einterest." I would imagine that's quite a lot of work. > > Ouch, but I suppose this is less work than say write form scratch an > optimizing JIT for 4 or 5 different architectures (x86, AMD64, =20 > powerpc32bit, > powerpc64bit, sparc, arm, etc.) Well, I dunno. I would think that if we got enough momentum and =20 became 'real', we'd find someone from Intel, AMD, IBM, Sun etc to =20 help out ;) I'm actually not that worried about the ports. I think that this is one of the few places where I'd bet that "if we =20 build it, they *will* come" geir > > RB > > -----Original Message----- > From: David Griffiths [mailto:david.griffiths@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 11:33 PM > To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: timeframe for mid-level decissions > > >> =46rom the llvm web site: "LLVM does not currently support garbage >> > collection of multi-threaded programs or GC-safe points other than > function calls, but these will be added in the future as there is > interest." I would imagine that's quite a lot of work. > > Cheers, > > Dave > > --=20 Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 geirm@apache.org