harmony-dev mailing list archives: May 2005

Site index · List index
Message list« Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Ben Laurie Re: Apache Harmony / GNU Classpath Thu, 12 May, 13:43
Davanum Srinivas Re: Apache Harmony / GNU Classpath Thu, 12 May, 13:56
Ben Laurie Re: Apache Harmony / GNU Classpath Thu, 12 May, 14:10
Ricky Clarkson Re: A small documentation contribution Thu, 12 May, 14:24
Brett Porter Re: Apache Harmony / GNU Classpath Thu, 12 May, 14:25
Mark Wielaard Re: Apache Harmony / GNU Classpath Thu, 12 May, 14:28
Davanum Srinivas Re: Apache Harmony / GNU Classpath Thu, 12 May, 14:28
Simon Chappell Re: Java Thu, 12 May, 14:47
Davanum Srinivas Re: Apache Harmony / GNU Classpath Thu, 12 May, 15:07
Mladen Turk Re: Apache Harmony / GNU Classpath Thu, 12 May, 15:08
Davanum Srinivas Re: Apache Harmony / GNU Classpath Thu, 12 May, 15:16
Humberto S. N. dos Anjos Re: Class Library Modularity [Was Re: State of the World] Thu, 12 May, 15:27
Stefano Mazzocchi Re: Apache Harmony / GNU Classpath Thu, 12 May, 15:41
Mladen Turk Re: Apache Harmony / GNU Classpath Thu, 12 May, 15:41
Stefano Mazzocchi Re: Harmony may provide a more general VM than JVM Thu, 12 May, 15:54
Davanum Srinivas Re: Apache Harmony / GNU Classpath Thu, 12 May, 15:57
Matt Benson Re: Apache Harmony / GNU Classpath Thu, 12 May, 15:58
Stefano Mazzocchi Re: Against using Java to implement Java (Was: Java) Thu, 12 May, 15:59
Dalibor Topic Re: Apache Harmony / GNU Classpath Thu, 12 May, 16:00
Stefano Mazzocchi Re: Java Thu, 12 May, 16:05
Steven Martin Native Calls? Thu, 12 May, 16:11
Mladen Turk Re: Apache Harmony / GNU Classpath Thu, 12 May, 16:11
Davanum Srinivas Re: Apache Harmony / GNU Classpath Thu, 12 May, 16:14
Richard S. Hall Re: Class Library Modularity [Was Re: State of the World] Thu, 12 May, 16:21
Steven Martin Re: Java Thu, 12 May, 16:25
tum...@mac.com Re: Against using Java to implement Java (Was: Java) Thu, 12 May, 16:30
Nookala Satish Kumar What does Harmony mean to me? Thu, 12 May, 16:56
Steven Martin Re: What does Harmony mean to me? Thu, 12 May, 17:00
Daniel John Debrunner Re: Apache Harmony / GNU Classpath Thu, 12 May, 17:04
Davanum Srinivas Re: Apache Harmony / GNU Classpath Thu, 12 May, 17:08
Davanum Srinivas Re: Against using Java to implement Java (Was: Java) Thu, 12 May, 17:10
Davanum Srinivas Wishlist Thu, 12 May, 17:23
Santiago Gala Re: Apache Harmony / GNU Classpath Thu, 12 May, 17:33
Davanum Srinivas Re: Apache Harmony / GNU Classpath Thu, 12 May, 17:38
Nookala Satish Kumar Re: Wishlist Thu, 12 May, 18:12
Steven Martin Re: Wishlist Thu, 12 May, 18:32
Davanum Srinivas Re: Wishlist Thu, 12 May, 18:45
Stefano Mazzocchi Re: Apache Harmony / GNU Classpath Thu, 12 May, 18:57
Steven Martin Re: Wishlist Thu, 12 May, 19:00
Davanum Srinivas Re: Wishlist Thu, 12 May, 19:06
Archie Cobbs Re: Wishlist Thu, 12 May, 19:17
Davanum Srinivas Re: Wishlist Thu, 12 May, 19:28
Davanum Srinivas Re: [gnu.org #239354] Re: Apache Harmony / GNU Classpath Thu, 12 May, 20:04
Nick Lothian RE: Wishlist Thu, 12 May, 23:26
Nick Lothian RE: A small documentation contribution Thu, 12 May, 23:27
Nick Lothian RE: JIT vs. WAT Thu, 12 May, 23:36
Tom Tromey Re: Apache Harmony / GNU Classpath Thu, 12 May, 23:41
Tom Tromey Re: Apache Harmony / GNU Classpath Thu, 12 May, 23:43
Geir Magnusson Jr. Re: Backward compatibility Fri, 13 May, 00:12
FaeLLe Re: Backward compatibility Fri, 13 May, 00:29
Tom Tromey Re: JIT vs. WAT Fri, 13 May, 00:41
王在祥 Re: Harmony may provide a more general VM than JVM Fri, 13 May, 01:25
Gerry Steele Re: Native Calls? Fri, 13 May, 01:25
Archie Cobbs Re: JIT vs. WAT Fri, 13 May, 02:07
FaeLLe [ Fri, 13 May, 02:15
Davanum Srinivas Re: [ Fri, 13 May, 02:16
Nick Lothian RE: [ Fri, 13 May, 02:34
Steve Blackburn Re: I hope the JVM implements most using Java itself Fri, 13 May, 02:44
Vlad Zelenko RE: [ Fri, 13 May, 02:51
Mark Brooks RE: Against using Java to implement Java (Was: Java) Fri, 13 May, 03:02
Nick Lothian RE: JIT vs. WAT Fri, 13 May, 03:03
Bob Re: JIT vs. WAT Fri, 13 May, 03:17
Nick Lothian RE: Against using Java to implement Java (Was: Java) Fri, 13 May, 03:21
Kev Jackson Re: Against using Java to implement Java (Was: Java) Fri, 13 May, 03:26
FaeLLe Re: Against using Java to implement Java (Was: Java) Fri, 13 May, 03:41
FaeLLe Against using Java to implement Java (Was: Java) Fri, 13 May, 03:46
Kev Jackson Re: Against using Java to implement Java (Was: Java) Fri, 13 May, 04:07
FaeLLe Re: Against using Java to implement Java (Was: Java) Fri, 13 May, 04:10
Torsten Curdt Re: [ Fri, 13 May, 04:29
Kev Jackson Re: Against using Java to implement Java (Was: Java) Fri, 13 May, 04:34
FaeLLe Re: Against using Java to implement Java (Was: Java) Fri, 13 May, 04:46
Dmitry Serebrennikov Re: I hope the JVM implements most using Java itself Fri, 13 May, 04:50
Stefano Mazzocchi Re: [ Fri, 13 May, 04:56
Nick Lothian Proposal: A VM launcher Fri, 13 May, 05:01
Steve Blackburn Developing Harmony Fri, 13 May, 05:23
Nick Lothian RE: I hope the JVM implements most using Java itself Fri, 13 May, 05:26
Steve Blackburn Re: I hope the JVM implements most using Java itself Fri, 13 May, 06:31
Mark Brooks RE: [ Fri, 13 May, 07:42
Ben Laurie Re: [ Fri, 13 May, 07:45
Mohammed Al-Qaimari Re: Against using Java to implement Java (Was: Java) Fri, 13 May, 07:48
Mohammed Al-Qaimari Java Application Native Wrapper Fri, 13 May, 07:53
王在祥 Re: Against using Java to implement Java (Was: Java) Fri, 13 May, 07:57
Ben Laurie Re: Against using Java to implement Java (Was: Java) Fri, 13 May, 07:58
Kev Jackson Re: [ Fri, 13 May, 08:00
Mark Brooks Re: Against using Java to implement Java (Was: Java) Fri, 13 May, 08:04
Mark Brooks Re: Against using Java to implement Java (Was: Java) Fri, 13 May, 08:24
Ben Laurie Re: Against using Java to implement Java (Was: Java) Fri, 13 May, 08:41
Matthew French RE: Against using Java to implement Java (Was: Java) Fri, 13 May, 09:06
Steve Heath Re: Harmony may provide a more general VM than JVM Fri, 13 May, 09:09
Panagiotis Astithas Re: Against using Java to implement Java (Was: Java) Fri, 13 May, 09:15
Panagiotis Astithas Re: JIT vs. WAT Fri, 13 May, 09:33
Steve Heath Re: Against using Java to implement Java (Was: Java) Fri, 13 May, 09:51
Ravi kiran Gorrepati Re: mudGE JavaVM. Fri, 13 May, 10:10
Panagiotis Astithas Re: Developing Harmony Fri, 13 May, 10:11
Steven Martin Re: Native Calls? Fri, 13 May, 10:27
David Griffiths Third Way - implement the JVM in a new C/Java hybrid Fri, 13 May, 10:51
Davanum Srinivas Re: Developing Harmony Fri, 13 May, 10:52
Bob Re: Third Way - implement the JVM in a new C/Java hybrid Fri, 13 May, 10:56
Ben Laurie Re: Against using Java to implement Java (Was: Java) Fri, 13 May, 11:00
Davanum Srinivas Two seeds (Re: Developing Harmony) Fri, 13 May, 11:24
Message list« Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Box list
Nov 201132
Oct 201135
Sep 20112
Aug 20111
Jul 20111
Jun 201115
May 20115
Apr 20114
Mar 201116
Feb 201116
Jan 201135
Dec 201060
Nov 201079
Oct 201037
Sep 2010229
Aug 2010104
Jul 201090
Jun 201086
May 2010154
Apr 2010119
Mar 2010162
Feb 201093
Jan 2010121
Dec 2009174
Nov 2009258
Oct 2009131
Sep 2009141
Aug 2009244
Jul 2009222
Jun 2009238
May 2009238
Apr 2009452
Mar 2009350
Feb 2009218
Jan 2009233
Dec 2008367
Nov 2008280
Oct 2008115
Sep 2008179
Aug 2008198
Jul 2008221
Jun 2008181
May 2008279
Apr 2008889
Mar 2008769
Feb 2008520
Jan 2008446
Dec 2007447
Nov 2007628
Oct 2007793
Sep 2007522
Aug 2007326
Jul 2007471
Jun 2007724
May 2007727
Apr 20071191
Mar 2007947
Feb 2007818
Jan 20071184
Dec 20061883
Nov 20062938
Oct 20062907
Sep 20061962
Aug 20061525
Jul 20061628
Jun 20061497
May 20061004
Apr 20061027
Mar 20061190
Feb 20061283
Jan 2006645
Dec 2005233
Nov 2005345
Oct 2005294
Sep 2005166
Aug 200594
Jul 2005207
Jun 2005319
May 20051277