>>>>> "Jakob" == Jakob Praher <jpraher@yahoo.de> writes:
>> 2. Performance. The result has to be reasonable competitive
>> performance wise. E.g., starting eclipse has to be reasonable both in
>> time and space.
Jakob> How are doing with gcj in this direction?
I'm not sure I understand. We do ok right now -- not great, but
competitive. We're starting to look at performance a bit more now
than we did in the past.
Jakob> IMHO harmony should be ably to understand the
Jakob> gcj abi and the so cache, which is right now at the very heart of gcj.
This is hard for the reasons outlined before.
Tom
|