harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Larry Meadors <larry.mead...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Java
Date Wed, 11 May 2005 04:47:33 GMT
Maybe we should build it with Mono.

;-)

Larry

PS: Yes, I am only kidding.


On 5/10/05, Ken Shao <ken.shao@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I can't agree write JVM in Java.
> It's crazy. We should make it more powerful, at least we can against .Net.
> 
> On 5/11/05, Fernando Lozano <fernando@lozano.eti.br> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > See how today we have many high-quality network servers, database
> > drivers, IDEs, compilers, interpreters and other kinds of system-level
> > software written in Java. If Java has proven to be more productive for
> > these software, why not for the VM itself? There's no reason we should
> > still be dealing with zero-bytes at the end of strings and size of
> > buffers at every string copy.
> >
> > []s, Fernando Lozano
> >
> > sergio escreveu:
> >
> > > I agree.
> > >
> > > Steve Blackburn escreveu:
> > >
> > >> I would like advocate the use of Java in implementing the VM (*).
> > >> This may seem a low-level issue, but I'm raising it now because it
> > >> will have significant implications for the VM core and the overall
> > >> approach this project takes.
> > >>
> > >> Why? a) Software engineering benefits. b) Performance. c) "Eating
> > >> your own dog food" is good for you.
> > >
> >
> >
> 
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message