harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mark Brooks" <jmb_perso...@hotmail.com>
Subject Re: Developing Harmony
Date Wed, 18 May 2005 01:17:06 GMT
>C++, just C++, is a recipe for trouble. Most projects that use it define a
>subset to make development a less painfull talk. Usually operator
>overloading, templates and virtual inheritance are discarded.

Agreed.  If the decision is to go with C++, it will need to be a subset of 
C++ for sanity.  I still think that, at most, a minimal C kernel and the 
rest in Java is a better option.

> > As I said before, don't assume we're all Java fans here. I'm far more
> > familiar with C++ than I am with Java.
> >
> > Ben.

If you aren't a Java fan, why are you interested in Harmony?  Or am I 
misinterpreting what you meant there?

Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! 

View raw message