harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rodrigo Kumpera <kump...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [arch] VM/Classlibrary interface
Date Fri, 27 May 2005 23:40:54 GMT
On 5/27/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geirm@apache.org> wrote:
> On May 27, 2005, at 4:34 PM, Rodrigo Kumpera wrote:
> > We should provide wrappers to classes for the sake of
> > compatibility. Are
> > there any legal problems with doing so?
> Why would we do that? We don't want to encourage such misbehavior...?
> geir

There are two kinds of compatibility: by specification, the TCK buy us that; 
and pragmatic, and this is having software just work.

Look around for all FOSS that are made to be an alternative to proprietary 
software, they all have kludges to be implementation compatible to the 
non-free counterpart.

Last time I checked, no one, nether me or you, is developing code agains the 
TCK, but to a real JVM. And as hard as we may try, sometimes we end with 
software that depends on unspecified behavior. So it's better try to be "bug 
compatible" too.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message