harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From FaeLLe <mrbillcollec...@gmail.com>
Subject Against using Java to implement Java (Was: Java)
Date Fri, 13 May 2005 03:46:54 GMT
Hmm my mail got bounced,

*Symantec Mail Security detected that you sent a message containing 
prohibited content (SYM:09556261464022074052)* 

 Subject of the message: Re: Against using Java to implement Java (Was: 
Java)Recipient of the message: "harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org" <

 ---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: FaeLLe <mrbillcollector@gmail.com>
Date: May 13, 2005 4:41 AM
Subject: Re: Against using Java to implement Java (Was: Java)
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org

On 5/13/05, Kev Jackson <kevin.jackson@it.fts-vn.com> wrote:
> >
> > So speak up project lead(s). We are here. We are talking a lot, but
> > not much is happening. Order us about. Assign work. Let's get our
> > hands dirty. The likelihood is that there will be changes along the 
> > way anyhow. There almost always are, and developers dedicated to the
> > project will simply have to adapt.
> >
> couldn't agree more, the more 'talking' happening here, the less
> progress seems to be made. The guys rant on bile blog had some points 
> about people here talking and waiting for a code drop from
> IBM/Sun/whoever. I'd like to help on this I really would, but I need a
> direction, what are we doing here? Is it a glue classpath to kaffe to
> xxx? Is it a write everything from scratch? If we want to get started 
> we need some code, without it we're just wasting everyone's time

How are you wasting replying to emails and undertaking a discussion.

If you think spending time on a good design phase is a waste of time on such 
a massive project theres something wrong...


www.FaeLLe.com <http://www.FaeLLe.com> 

www.FaeLLe.com <http://www.FaeLLe.com>

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message