harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Davanum Srinivas <dava...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: The topic of the Java Compiler
Date Sat, 14 May 2005 21:22:40 GMT
yep. either one would work.

-- dims

On 5/14/05, Berlin Brown <berlin.brown@gmail.com> wrote:
> Curious, why not jikes, it seems to have a liberal license.
> 
> On 13 May 2005 17:38:54 -0600, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >>>>> "Berlin" == Berlin Brown <berlin.brown@gmail.com> writes:
> >
> > Berlin> The compiler seems to be a non-issue at this time with a focus
> > Berlin> on the JavaVM.  What are your thoughts on the different
> > Berlin> compilers?
> >
> > For Harmony I would say the leading contender is the java compiler
> > that comes with Eclipse.  It is written in java and already supports
> > all the 1.5 features.
> >
> > As far as gcj goes, the new 1.5-ish front end I'm writing has a
> > standalone part which does all the language processing and bytecode
> > generation.  It does not depend on the rest of gcc at all.  It is
> > written in C++.
> >
> > kjc is also out there and being developed, but I don't know much about
> > it.
> >
> > Tom
> >
> 


-- 
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/

Mime
View raw message