harmony-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mark Hindess (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-6620) [jdktools] Unit tests to test the functionality of the javac/javaw binaries
Date Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:57:16 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12900272#action_12900272
] 

Mark Hindess commented on HARMONY-6620:
---------------------------------------

Sorry, I don't understand?  These tests are for harmony and harmony javac is just a wrapper
around ecj.jar so for your test to pass on harmony ecj.jar must have the message you expect
or it will never work?  Ideally they should pass on both harmony and the RI but unless they
pass on harmony I really don't think they are going to be much use?


> [jdktools] Unit tests to test the functionality of the javac/javaw binaries
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HARMONY-6620
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6620
>             Project: Harmony
>          Issue Type: Test
>          Components: JDK
>         Environment: Windows and Linux
>            Reporter: Prashanth KS
>             Fix For: 5.0M15
>
>         Attachments: 001_HARMONY_6620.patch, 002_HARMONY_6620.patch, resources.zip
>
>
> The ANT unit tests written for the jdktools binaries such as javac aren't flexible enough.
i.e. if there is a test failure then the rest of the tests are skipped. Moreover, there aren't
a lot of test scenarios created for these binaries.
> Added Unit tests to test the javac.exe and javaw.exe tools. This helps in providing a
better analysis of these tools across different runtimes.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message