harmony-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mark Hindess (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-6516) [java6][classlib][luni]Items in map which reterned by HttpURLConnection.getHeaderFields() should be in reverse order
Date Mon, 24 May 2010 09:34:23 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12870539#action_12870539
] 

Mark Hindess commented on HARMONY-6516:
---------------------------------------

I agree with Jesse that harmony behaviour is more sane.  We don't have to match the RI if
the RI behaviour is unhelpful to developers. We should close this bug as non-bug difference
rather than try "fix" the harmony code.

Whether we get the RI changed or not isn't really relevant but we should try to do that -
by raising a bug or getting someone to do it on our behalf - if we can.  However, the fact
that the behaviour changed between java5 and java6 and no one has complained enough that sun
fixed it suggests to me that no one really relies on this behaviour.


> [java6][classlib][luni]Items in map which reterned by HttpURLConnection.getHeaderFields()
should be in reverse order 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HARMONY-6516
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6516
>             Project: Harmony
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Classlib
>            Reporter: Ray Chen
>         Attachments: Harmony_6516.diff
>
>
> RI6 will retrun a map in which the items are in reverse order, however RI5 didn't require
that.
> So only fix this in java6 branch

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message