Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-commits-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 38457 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2010 15:02:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Feb 2010 15:02:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 13354 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2010 15:02:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-commits-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 13331 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2010 15:02:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commits-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list commits@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 13315 invoked by uid 99); 24 Feb 2010 15:02:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:02:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:02:49 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F00129A0015 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 07:02:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <537642940.492971267023748124.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:02:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Mark Hindess (JIRA)" To: commits@harmony.apache.org Subject: [jira] Closed: (HARMONY-6436) [java6]implement javax.annotation package In-Reply-To: <1020506974.77271264590394961.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Hindess closed HARMONY-6436. --------------------------------- I think it makes sense to keep it now we have done the work - especially since we need to do javax.annotation.processing anyway. I just wondered why we did it. > [java6]implement javax.annotation package > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HARMONY-6436 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6436 > Project: Harmony > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: Classlib > Reporter: Ray Chen > Assignee: Regis Xu > Fix For: 6.0M1 > > Attachments: Harmony6436_v2.diff > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.