harmony-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jim Yu (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-6420) [test] Increase the method coverage rate for unit test
Date Wed, 20 Jan 2010 04:57:55 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802666#action_12802666
] 

Jim Yu commented on HARMONY-6420:
---------------------------------

Hi Nathan,
These data are generated on my local machine. Seems Sean had done some integration work of
EMMA into BTI system. But as I know, that can't work properly. 

> [test] Increase the method coverage rate for unit test
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HARMONY-6420
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6420
>             Project: Harmony
>          Issue Type: Test
>          Components: Classlib
>    Affects Versions: 5.0M12
>            Reporter: Jim Yu
>             Fix For: 5.0M13
>
>         Attachments: baseline-report.zip, Result-report.zip
>
>
> I recently generated a coverage report for Harmony trunk and would like to contribute
more test cases to increase the method coverage rate for it. Currently, these patches are
made for the main modules as below. After applying these patches, the average method coverage
rate for these modules can reach 90% above. I also attached the reports of the baseline and
the result with patches.
> java.io
> java.lang
> java.lang.instrument
> java.lang.reflect
> javax.print.*
> java.net
> java.util
> javax.sql.*
> javax.acessibility

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message