harmony-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Li Jing Qin (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-6099) [eut][classlib][net] Non-bug difference with RI: Handler field in java.net.URL?
Date Tue, 10 Mar 2009 03:12:50 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12680367#action_12680367
] 

Li Jing Qin commented on HARMONY-6099:
--------------------------------------

Hi, from the eclipse discussion, they have Fixed this. Maybe we can try the nightly build
EUT again.

> [eut][classlib][net] Non-bug difference with RI: Handler field in java.net.URL?
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HARMONY-6099
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6099
>             Project: Harmony
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: build - test - ci
>         Environment: win32
>            Reporter: Chunrong Lai
>
>   Harmony throws exception for the test case extracted from EUT, while I do not think
Harmony has problem (I did not see "handler" field is required).  So should it be a bug of
EUT? Anyway it reduces the pass rate of Harmony for OSGI test of EUT.
>  
> import java.lang.reflect.Field;
> import java.net.*;
> public class TestURLHandler {
>     public static void main(String[] args) {
>      try {
>       Field handlerField = URL.class.getDeclaredField("handler");
>       handlerField.setAccessible(true);
>       System.out.println("OK");
>      } catch (Exception e) {
>       e.printStackTrace();
>      }
>     }
> }

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message