harmony-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Chunrong Lai (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Created: (HARMONY-6099) [eut][classlib][net] Non-bug difference with RI: Handler field in java.net.URL?
Date Mon, 23 Feb 2009 07:27:01 GMT
[eut][classlib][net] Non-bug difference with RI: Handler field in java.net.URL?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: HARMONY-6099
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6099
             Project: Harmony
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: build - test - ci
         Environment: win32
            Reporter: Chunrong Lai



  Harmony throws exception for the test case extracted from EUT, while I do not think Harmony
has problem (I did not see "handler" field is required).  So should it be a bug of EUT? Anyway
it reduces the pass rate of Harmony for OSGI test of EUT.
 
import java.lang.reflect.Field;
import java.net.*;

public class TestURLHandler {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
     try {
      Field handlerField = URL.class.getDeclaredField("handler");
      handlerField.setAccessible(true);
      System.out.println("OK");
     } catch (Exception e) {
      e.printStackTrace();
     }
    }
}


-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message