harmony-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jim Yu (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Updated: (HARMONY-6101) [classlib][luni] Extraneous path separator in *.boot.class.path on IBM VME 5
Date Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:47:04 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel

Jim Yu updated HARMONY-6101:

    Attachment: HARMONY-6101_V2.diff

> [classlib][luni] Extraneous path separator in *.boot.class.path on IBM VME 5
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HARMONY-6101
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6101
>             Project: Harmony
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Classlib
>            Reporter: Jim Yu
>         Attachments: HARMONY-6101_V2.diff
> By using IBM VME 5, while running SystemTest.test_getProperty_bootClassPath test case
> both Linux and Windows, there is a failure:
> Boot class path contains extra patch separator.
> In the boot class path, I can see an extra ':' on Linux after:
> deploy/jdk/jre/bin/default/security-kernel.jar
> Since similar issue has been resolved in HARMONY-3298 and the test can pass on IBM VME
>  I suppose this may be caused by the VME 5. After my further investigation, I found out
that the root
>  cause of this issue is a behavior change by VME 5. For VME 4, there is no CP separator
at the end
>  of the boot strap class path set by VM. So it is OK for Harmony to extend the boot class
path with 
> values retrieved from bootclasspath.properties begins with a CP separator . But for VME
5, root class
>  path set by VM will add a CP separator at the end, so an repeated CP separator is generated.
> it was caused by the change of VME, I find out a tricky method to make Harmony work well
on both 
> VME 4 and VME 5. I've tested my patch. It works fine on VME4, VME5 and DRLVM.
> Can someone take a look at this? Thanks.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message