Mailing-List: contact commits-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Message-ID: <29562790.1196085104805.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 05:51:44 -0800 (PST)
From: "Tim Ellison (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: commits@harmony.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Updated: (HARMONY-4972) [drlvm][jitrino]unbalanced
 monenter/monexit  pair in HIR
In-Reply-To: <32679604.1192776830562.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-4972?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Tim Ellison updated HARMONY-4972:
---------------------------------

    Priority: Major  (was: Critical)

Reducing the priority as per Pavel's suggestion.


> [drlvm][jitrino]unbalanced monenter/monexit  pair in HIR
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HARMONY-4972
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-4972
>             Project: Harmony
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: DRLVM
>         Environment: compiled by JDK5.0
>            Reporter: Chengrong Shi
>         Attachments: test.rar
>
>
>     I found a puzzling case of the HIR. The attachment is the picture of the HIR. In this pictrue, the control flows along the 2 in-edges of Node 98(the node whose id is 98) seem to have different lock state.The control flow from the left in-edge is unlocked at the end of Node 102, but the control flow from the right in-edge is not unlocked. Because if exception has been thrown then the last monexit of Node 102 will not been executed.
>     Is this case legal? Or I missed something else?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.