Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-commits-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 42940 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2007 15:14:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Oct 2007 15:14:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 68858 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2007 15:13:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-commits-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 68842 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2007 15:13:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commits-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list commits@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 68833 invoked by uid 99); 18 Oct 2007 15:13:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Oct 2007 08:13:59 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.4] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:14:11 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D783271420D for ; Thu, 18 Oct 2007 08:13:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <16054505.1192720430859.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 08:13:50 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tim Ellison (JIRA)" To: commits@harmony.apache.org Subject: [jira] Resolved: (HARMONY-4869) [classlib][nio][performance] Selector improvements: moving away from O(n) at Java layer, part 1 In-Reply-To: <4521034.1190909930977.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-4869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tim Ellison resolved HARMONY-4869. ---------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Thanks Aleksey. Patch applied with minor code formatting changes(*) to NIO module at repo revision r586000. Please check it was applied as you expected. (*) Tabs yuk! > [classlib][nio][performance] Selector improvements: moving away from O(n) at Java layer, part 1 > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HARMONY-4869 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-4869 > Project: Harmony > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Classlib > Environment: all > Reporter: Aleksey Shipilev > Assignee: Tim Ellison > Attachments: selectors-JL-O1.patch > > > Current implementation of java.nio.channels.Selector is O(n) for Selector.select() operation. > There are several causes: > 1. "keys" is the HashSet, so we spend time on iterating over it > 2. "keys" are iterated on every select() to prepare the readable and writable arrays for native call > This patch includes a bunch of optimizations: > 1. Creates hashCode() and equals() for SelectionKeyImpl to get rid of calling _native_ identityHashCode() > 2. Changes the internal representation of keys to SelectionKeyImpl[] and adds logic for on-the-fly maintenance > 3. Adds on-the-fly maintenance for readable and writable arrays, making them prepared right away for every select() > 4. Adds indexes for easy mapping "keys<->FD" > 5. Optimizes hotpath in processResults(). > Keeping in mind that count(register) <= count(select), we sure that moving key set maintenance to register() is performance-safe. > Thus, we simplify one part of Selector.select() call from being O(n) in the Java layer. There are also processResults() scales as O(n) and still portlib and native layers too - they're going to be optimized later too. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.