harmony-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ilya Berezhniuk (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Updated: (HARMONY-4766) [drlvm][thread] ThreadGroup.destroy() does not destroy groups with threads
Date Fri, 07 Sep 2007 23:41:30 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-4766?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Ilya Berezhniuk updated HARMONY-4766:
-------------------------------------

    Attachment: TG1.java

The test application I used.

> [drlvm][thread] ThreadGroup.destroy() does not destroy groups with threads
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HARMONY-4766
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-4766
>             Project: Harmony
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: DRLVM
>            Reporter: Ilya Berezhniuk
>         Attachments: TG1.java
>
>
> While investigating HARMONY-4361 I've discovered that ThreadGroup.destroy() behavior
is incorrect.
> I did not experiment with daemon groups, but for non-daemon groups ThreadGroup.destroy()
throws j.l.IllegalThreadStateException when trying to destroy thread group containing thread(s),
regardless of conditions.
> API spec. says: "This thread group must be empty, indicating that all threads that had
been in this thread group have since stopped"
> In other words, it should be possible to destroy group containing stopped thread, and
also containing subgroups with stopped threads.
> I've wrote simple test to check RI behavior, and on both Sun and BEA VMs it's OK to destroy
group with stopped thread, and even group with a thread which is not started yet.
> Harmony throws exception for not started threads as well as for finished threads.
> It's possible that some points in my test are incorrect, but it's evident that Harmony
behavior essentially differs from RI behavior.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message