Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-commits-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 19571 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2007 16:16:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Aug 2007 16:16:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 59174 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2007 16:16:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-commits-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 59085 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2007 16:16:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commits-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list commits@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 59076 invoked by uid 99); 30 Aug 2007 16:16:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Aug 2007 09:16:46 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.4] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:16:50 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B8AF714168 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2007 09:16:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6104.1188490590600.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 09:16:30 -0700 (PDT) From: "Oliver Deakin (JIRA)" To: commits@harmony.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-4523) [classlib][swing]BasicSliderUI.ActionScroller should be marked with notImplementedException In-Reply-To: <3642585.1185268411355.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-4523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12523875 ] Oliver Deakin commented on HARMONY-4523: ---------------------------------------- Yes, that patch is closer to what I was thinking of. Just a couple of small things: 1) Should we put a "throw new NotImplementedException();" into the actionPerformed() method so that anyone calling it is told immediately that it will not behave as expected without inspecting the code? 2) It seems that the implementation of isEnabled() is simply "return enabled". In this case, we could implement this immediately and remove the "throws NotImplementedException" from the method signature. What do you think? > [classlib][swing]BasicSliderUI.ActionScroller should be marked with notImplementedException > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HARMONY-4523 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-4523 > Project: Harmony > Issue Type: Task > Components: Classlib > Reporter: Dmitry Irlyanov > Assignee: Oliver Deakin > Priority: Trivial > Attachments: H4523-BasicSliderUI.patch > > > BasicSliderUI.ActionScroller class is obsolete since 1.3 (it's indicated in javadoc 1.5) and unimplemented, but the methods aren't marked with NotImplementedExeption -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.