Mailing-List: contact commits-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Message-ID: <9634728.1183365484764.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 01:38:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Vladimir Ivanov (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: commits@harmony.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Assigned: (HARMONY-4308) [buildtest][vts] Test
 vm/jvms/classFile/structure/accessFlags/accessFlags08/accessFlags08.xml
 corresponds 1.4 specifications
In-Reply-To: <20494138.1183361704975.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-4308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Vladimir Ivanov reassigned HARMONY-4308:
----------------------------------------

    Assignee: Vladimir Ivanov

> [buildtest][vts] Test vm/jvms/classFile/structure/accessFlags/accessFlags08/accessFlags08.xml corresponds 1.4 specifications 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HARMONY-4308
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-4308
>             Project: Harmony
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: build - test - ci
>            Reporter: Vera Petrashkova
>            Assignee: Vladimir Ivanov
>
> According to the test description
>     vm/jvms/classFile/structure/accessFlags/accessFlags08/accessFlags08.xml
>            "Checks that VM loads class with ACC_PUBLIC, ACC_FINAL flags set and all unused
>              (reserved) bits set to 1. Positive test."
> this test uses access flags xF9DF and expects that VM does not throw ClassFormatError because
> 1.4 spec defines the following flags 
>       ACC_PUBLIC = 0x0001 
>       ACC_FINAL = 0x0010 
>       ACC_SUPER = 0x0020 
>       ACC_INTERFACE = 0x0200
>      ACC_ABSTRACT = 0x0400 
> and says that  If the ACC_INTERFACE flag of this class file is not set, it may have any of the other flags. 
> And  all bits of the access_flags item not assigned in spec are reserved for future use. 
> They should be set to zero in generated class files and should be ignored by JVM  implementations.
> But 1.5 spec defines new access flags ACC_ANNOTATION = 0x2000 and ACC_ENUM = 0x4000 and it says
> that if the ACC_ANNOTATION flag is set, the ACC_INTERFACE flag must be set as well.
> As the result this test fails with ClassFormatError: annotation type must be interface
> Used access flags should be fixed according to 1.5 specifications or this test should be removed.
> Tests from accessFlags015, accessFlags18 and accessFlags19 subsuites check the using of ACC_ANNORATION flag.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.