harmony-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Andrey Pavlenko (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Updated: (HARMONY-4428) [buildtest][func] test func/api/javax/naming/provider/rmi/FederationSupportOFTest is incorrect
Date Wed, 18 Jul 2007 06:40:04 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-4428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel

Andrey Pavlenko updated HARMONY-4428:

    Attachment: HARMONY-4428.patch

As I mentioned before the RMI provider does not support federation. Moreover, I believe this
functionality will be never implemented. So, I propose to remove the unnecessary Federation*
tests from the functional test suite. The attached patch removes the java sources and the
xml descriptors of the tests.

> [buildtest][func] test func/api/javax/naming/provider/rmi/FederationSupportOFTest is
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HARMONY-4428
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-4428
>             Project: Harmony
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: build - test - ci
>            Reporter: Vladimir Ivanov
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: HARMONY-4428.patch
> The test functional/org/apache/harmony/test/func/api/javax/naming/provider/rmi/FederationSupportOFTest.xml
tries to use the 'String' object for bind method for RMI provider and test failed with message
> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: RegistryContext: object to bind must be Remote, Reference,
or Referenceable
> Seems, the something like 'new Reference("java.lang.Object")' instead of ' "Obj"' should
be used.
> Similar issue exists in func tests:
> functional/org/apache/harmony/test/func/api/javax/naming/provider/rmi/FederationSupportRefTest.xml
> functional/org/apache/harmony/test/func/api/javax/naming/provider/rmi/FederationSupportTest.xml

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message