harmony-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Salikh Zakirov (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Created: (HARMONY-3288) [drlvm][thread] Use Pthreads/Win32 rather than APR for mutexes and condition variables
Date Fri, 02 Mar 2007 16:25:51 GMT
[drlvm][thread] Use Pthreads/Win32 rather than APR for mutexes and condition variables
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: HARMONY-3288
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3288
             Project: Harmony
          Issue Type: Improvement
            Reporter: Salikh Zakirov
         Attachments: 0001-allocate-fat-monitors-from-heap-directly-not-in-a-thread-pool.patch,
0002-rewritten-HyCond-and-HyMutex-to-use-pthread-calls.patch, 0003-fixed-callers-of-hymutex-and-hycond-to-use-address.patch

Currently DRLVM uses APR mutexes and condition variables. These require APR memory pools to
be allocated from,
and releasing memory pools may be tricky at times. For example, the memory lifecycle of the
native monitor is associated
with the java object lifecycle, thus requires a specific object-specific pool. While this
solution is possible, it will incur
significant memory overhead.

The attached patch series proposes a simplified model by using Pthreads or Win32 interfaces
directly, without layering APR.
It allows for explicit memory allocation and deallocation, and makes fixing thread memory
model much easier.

The patch series is incomplete, as it still uses APR thread creation APIs, and thus APR pools
are still created for every thread.
I will work further to remove this dependency as well.

The patches

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message