harmony-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Gregory Shimansky (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-2086) [drlvm][thread] java.util.concurrent.atomic natives misses VMSupportsCS8 function
Date Mon, 05 Mar 2007 06:20:51 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12477918

Gregory Shimansky commented on HARMONY-2086:

So does everyone agree that we should make an exception to this method and implement it directly
in VM instead of creating some sort of a kernel class? I tried to start a discussion in [1]
about this issue, but no one answered.

[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.harmony.devel/24056

> [drlvm][thread] java.util.concurrent.atomic natives misses VMSupportsCS8 function
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HARMONY-2086
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2086
>             Project: Harmony
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: DRLVM
>            Reporter: Nikolay Kuznetsov
>         Assigned To: weldon washburn
>         Attachments: atomics.patch, h2086.patch, Test.java
> java.util.concurrent.atomic natives misses VMSupportsCS8 function, which indicates whether
underlying JVM supports lockless CompareAndSet for longs.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message