harmony-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alexander Kleymenov (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-617) [classlib][luni] HttpURLConnection does not support persistent connections
Date Thu, 15 Feb 2007 08:41:05 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12473320

Alexander Kleymenov commented on HARMONY-617:

Hi Sian,

I think testProxiedConnectionPersistence is correct - it exposes 
functional differences between RI's and Harmony's implementations of HttpUC. 
I think we should comply with RI's behavior here.

I've checked HttpUCTest. Now (as under SVN) it is implementation 
independent (i.e. it can go on every class library). 
But some of our new test cases depends on internals of HttpUC implementation.
I think it could be more suitable to put such a test cases into another test
(or try to reimplement them in implementation independent manner).

Thank you,

> [classlib][luni] HttpURLConnection does not support persistent connections
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HARMONY-617
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-617
>             Project: Harmony
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Classlib
>            Reporter: Alexander Kleymenov
>         Assigned To: Paulex Yang
>         Attachments: luni.patch, luni2.patch, patch-test2.txt, test.patch
> Current HttpURLConnection does not support persistent connections while RI implementation
> Implementation of this mechanism will allow sufficiently increase the performance of
network applications based on HttpURLConnections. To make Harmony's implementation more attractive
for use this support SHALL be implemented.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message