harmony-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alexey Varlamov (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-2470) [classlib][luni][test] Harmony unit test org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.lang.PackageTest.test#isCompatibleWithLjava_lang_String is incorect
Date Wed, 07 Feb 2007 11:27:06 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2470?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12470915
] 

Alexey Varlamov commented on HARMONY-2470:
------------------------------------------

Mikhail, sorry for the late response.
I've redone fix for DRLVM at r504503, hopefully really final this time.

Regarding the j9 exclusion, I don't share your concerns: this is very specific test covering
only kernel classes so no harm to exclude it. Moreover, I'm against such artificial splittig
of tests, this would just increase mess in tests. 

> [classlib][luni][test] Harmony unit test org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.lang.PackageTest.test#isCompatibleWithLjava_lang_String
is incorect
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HARMONY-2470
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2470
>             Project: Harmony
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Classlib
>            Reporter: Artem Aliev
>         Assigned To: Alexey Varlamov
>         Attachments: H-2470_drlvm.patch, H-2470_test.patch
>
>
> According to J2SE API 5.0 specifications of java.lang.Package class:
> "Specification version numbers use a syntax that consists of positive decimal 
> integers separated by periods ".", for example "2.0" or "1.2.3.4.5.6.7". This 
> allows an extensible number to be used to represent major, minor, micro, etc. 
> versions. The version specification is described by the following formal 
> grammar: 
> SpecificationVersion: 
>     Digits RefinedVersionopt 
> RefinedVersion: 
>     . Digits 
>     . Digits RefinedVersion 
> Digits: 
>     Digit 
>     Digits 
> Digit: 
>     any character for which Character.isDigit(char) returns true, e.g. 0, 1, 
>     2, ... 
> "
> But the following Harmony unit test 
> org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.lang.PackageTest.test invokes
> Package.isCompatibleWith(String) with incorrect argument "2.1.9." to compare
> package's specification version with a desired version.
> See test case "test_isCompatibleWithLjava_lang_String".
> As the result this test case fails on RI and reports:
> test_isCompatibleWithLjava_lang_String(org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.lang.PackageTest)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError:
> Exception during isCompatibleWith test : For input string: ""
>         at
> org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.lang.PackageTest.test_isCompatibleWithLjava_lang_String(PackageTest.java:331)
>         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>         at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>         at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message