Mailing-List: contact commits-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Message-ID: <8485513.1170256986007.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 07:23:06 -0800 (PST)
From: "Mikhail Fursov (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: commits@harmony.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Updated: (HARMONY-2984) [drlvm][jit] More peephole
 optimizations implemented: IMUL and AND+CMP->TEST
In-Reply-To: <26017212.1168608807521.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Mikhail Fursov updated HARMONY-2984:
------------------------------------

    Attachment: peephole_2.diff

The updated version of the optimization. All asm parts replaced with C versions

> [drlvm][jit] More peephole optimizations implemented: IMUL and AND+CMP->TEST
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HARMONY-2984
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2984
>             Project: Harmony
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: DRLVM
>            Reporter: Mikhail Fursov
>         Assigned To: Alexey Varlamov
>         Attachments: peephole.diff, peephole_2.diff
>
>
> This patch adds 2 new peephole optimizations
> 1) IMUL 0, 1, 2 or power of 2 is simplified to ADD, MOV or SHIFT. This can not be done in HLO because these constants appears during HIR->LIR translation
> 2) AND, CMP, JZ sequence is simplified to TEST, JZ
> Linux guru, please check min/max bit asm functions in my patch. What do you think, should we use platform independed but slow algorithms here instead of asm?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.