Mailing-List: contact commits-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Message-ID: <5727726.1169732629394.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 05:43:49 -0800 (PST)
From: "Mikhail Loenko (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: commits@harmony.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Closed: (HARMONY-840) [classlib][beans] enabling of tests
 from StatementTest class (3)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Mikhail Loenko closed HARMONY-840.
----------------------------------


done

> [classlib][beans] enabling of tests from StatementTest class (3)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HARMONY-840
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-840
>             Project: Harmony
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>         Environment: winXP
>            Reporter: Alexei Zakharov
>         Assigned To: Mikhail Loenko
>         Attachments: StatementTest3.patch
>
>
> Attached patch enables two more tests from org.apache.harmony.beans.tests.java.beans.StatementTest:
> testExecute_ArrayGet
> testExecute_ArrayInvalidSet
> What have been done:
> 1. I have reworked the exception throwing model of Statement.findArrayMethod(). Now our implementation throws the same set of exceptions as RI does. 
> 2. I have also removed superfluous parameters from "get" and "set" invocations from tests since tests in their old form were invalid. However, old variants of tests pass on RI. IMHO it is RI bug. I have started new mail thread in the list about this topic. Anyway, even if we decide to be 100% compatible with RI here we will probably need do define an extra test. We don't need to test this doubtful logic in these tests IMHO.
>  

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.