harmony-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Gregory Shimansky (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-1789) [DRLVM] Race condition between Thread.interrupt and Object.wait, Thread.sleep or join
Date Wed, 15 Nov 2006 18:33:39 GMT
    [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1789?page=comments#action_12450142 ] 
Gregory Shimansky commented on HARMONY-1789:

If test is not reliable to show the bug, maybe just change the main function to run the current
main function many times?

> [DRLVM] Race condition between Thread.interrupt and Object.wait, Thread.sleep or join
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HARMONY-1789
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1789
>             Project: Harmony
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: DRLVM
>            Reporter: Nikolay Kuznetsov
>         Assigned To: Alexey Varlamov
>         Attachments: H-1789.patch, HARMONY1789.java, Test.java
> According to the specification wait/join or sleep methods should check if thread was
interrupted before entering wait. DRLVM hythread implmentation do checks interrupted status(see
hythread condition implmentation), however thread may be interrupted just after the status
was checked and before entering condition wait. Thus it's required to ensure that waiting
state will be reached having interrupted status unchanged.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


View raw message