harmony-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Salikh Zakirov (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-1789) [DRLVM] Race condition between Thread.interrupt and Object.wait, Thread.sleep or join
Date Thu, 16 Nov 2006 19:15:39 GMT
    [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1789?page=comments#action_12450498 ] 
            
Salikh Zakirov commented on HARMONY-1789:
-----------------------------------------

DRLVM with applied H-1789-update.patch + HARMONY-2217 + HARMONY+2218 + HARMONY-2219 passed
(almost all) tests on Linux/ia32 and Windows/ia32 (- gc.LOS -ThreadTest.testJoinlongint --
see HARMONY-2204)

> [DRLVM] Race condition between Thread.interrupt and Object.wait, Thread.sleep or join
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HARMONY-1789
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1789
>             Project: Harmony
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: DRLVM
>            Reporter: Nikolay Kuznetsov
>         Assigned To: Alexey Varlamov
>         Attachments: H-1789-updated.patch, H-1789.patch, HARMONY1789.java, Test.java
>
>
> According to the specification wait/join or sleep methods should check if thread was
interrupted before entering wait. DRLVM hythread implmentation do checks interrupted status(see
hythread condition implmentation), however thread may be interrupted just after the status
was checked and before entering condition wait. Thus it's required to ensure that waiting
state will be reached having interrupted status unchanged.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message