Mailing-List: contact harmony-commits-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Message-ID: <17291416.1160035700851.JavaMail.root@brutus>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 01:08:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Naveen Neelakantam (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: harmony-commits@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-1707) find_stack_* signals_em64t.cpp
 patch
In-Reply-To: <13562031.1160034920780.JavaMail.root@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

    [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1707?page=comments#action_12440060 ] 
            
Naveen Neelakantam commented on HARMONY-1707:
---------------------------------------------

FYI, pthread_attr_getstack returns the lowest addressable byte as the stack_addr.  However (as far as I can tell) find_stack_addr is expected to return the highest addressable byte.  This patch makes find_stack_addr return the expected value.

> find_stack_* signals_em64t.cpp patch
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HARMONY-1707
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1707
>             Project: Harmony
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: DRLVM
>            Reporter: Naveen Neelakantam
>         Attachments: find_stack_info.patch
>
>
> My pthread_attr_getstackaddr (HARMONY-990) patch was applied to signals_em64t.cpp.  However, my patch is not quite right.  Gregory Shimansky's patch (HARMONY-977) contains the correct modifications.
> Therefore, I've attached a patch that makes the em64t find_stack_size() and find_stack_addr() methods the same as their ia32 equivalents (which use Gregory's patch).
> Sorry, I should have noted this before.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira