Mailing-List: contact harmony-commits-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Message-ID: <10153519.1159519311910.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 01:41:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Geir Magnusson Jr (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: harmony-commits@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Closed: (HARMONY-1361) [luni] more failproof SUID
 calculation
In-Reply-To: <33411892.1157025262951.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1361?page=all ]

Geir Magnusson Jr closed HARMONY-1361.
--------------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

fixed with HARMONY-1123 in r451082

> [luni] more failproof SUID calculation
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HARMONY-1361
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1361
>             Project: Harmony
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Classlib
>            Reporter: Alexey Varlamov
>         Assigned To: Geir Magnusson Jr
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: suid-fix.patch
>
>
> The SUID calculation depends on poorly documented getSignature() method of kernel reflection classes, and may be vulnerable to subtle changes in value those methods return like using '.' vs '/' separators. Moreover, there are different separators expected for signatures of fields and ones of methods.
> I was just playing with DRLVM kernel classes optimizations and unexpectedly hit the issue of incompartible SUIDs. 
> So I suggest to add failproof formatting of method's signatures (it is already there for fields).

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira