harmony-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "George Harley (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-163) Three types in java.util.jar are not implemented in Harmony
Date Tue, 04 Apr 2006 10:29:46 GMT
    [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-163?page=comments#action_12373069 ] 

George Harley commented on HARMONY-163:

Hi Paulex, 

OK, I understood that this was an incomplete addition to the code base (my commit comment
was "awaiting default implementations and developer test code"). Given that the development
of the default types and the PackFactory can be done separately - and potentially by other
community members - it might be better to close this issue as fixed and open up a new JIRA
explicitly for the completion of this work. 

That would be my preference anyway.

Best regards, 

> Three types in java.util.jar are not implemented in Harmony
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>          Key: HARMONY-163
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-163
>      Project: Harmony
>         Type: Bug

>   Components: Classlib
>     Reporter: Paulex Yang
>     Assignee: George Harley
>  Attachments: Pack200interface.patch, java.beans.PropertyChangeListener.patch
> Three types:
> public abstract class java/util/jar/Pack200
> public interface java/util/jar/Pack200$Packer
> public interface java/util/jar/Pack200$Unpacker
> are introduced in JSE 5, but not implemented in Harmony

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
For more information on JIRA, see:

View raw message