harmony-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mark Hindess (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Updated: (HARMONY-353) improvements to junit test method usage
Date Mon, 17 Apr 2006 14:38:19 GMT
     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-353?page=all ]

Mark Hindess updated HARMONY-353:

    Attachment: assert.usage.combined.diff

Odd.  Works for me with unix patch on a fresh checkout.  Oh well, here's a comibned patch.

> improvements to junit test method usage
> ---------------------------------------
>          Key: HARMONY-353
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-353
>      Project: Harmony
>         Type: Improvement

>   Components: Classlib
>     Reporter: Mark Hindess
>     Assignee: Mikhail Loenko
>     Priority: Trivial
>  Attachments: 01.assertnull.diff, 02.assertequals.string.diff, 03.assertequals.constants.diff,
04.assertequals.char.constants.diff, 05.assertnotnull.diff, assert.usage.combined.diff, improved.assertequals.usage.diff
> While fixing the test in HARMONY-352, I found some confusing junit
> error messages.  They were things like:
>   error expected <actual> but got <expected>
> rather than:
>   error expected <expected> but got <actual>
> Because the arguments to the assertEquals method were the wrong way
> around.  The expected value should come first.  Anyway, I fixed these
> for that one test.  We should try to fix these when we find them and
> we should try to avoid adding any more.
> This JIRA is because I decided that it was reasonable to fix any method like:
>   assertEquals(..., <constant>);
> since a constant couldn't very well be the value being tested.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
For more information on JIRA, see:

View raw message