hama-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Suraj Menon <surajsme...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Pros of Hama over Giraph over Graph Processing
Date Sat, 26 May 2012 15:04:27 GMT
@Billy, completely agree, I gave a similar message at Apache BarCamp
DC last week.

@Praveen, I am sorry, I differ with you here. :) The Hama wiki should
only explain Hama performance. In my personal opinion, this should be
done by any interested user/developer outside. Hopefully, we would be
proud to share that link.


On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Billy Newport <billy@billynewport.com> wrote:
> I think the difference may be that Hama provides a bsp base with graph
> also. Giraph seems to just do graph. With Hama becoming a top level
> apache project now, it's hard to see giraph making it also given the
> overlap. My vote would be for giraph to combine forces and enhance
> Hama but we will see, I guess.
> Sent from my iPad
> On May 26, 2012, at 9:10 AM, Praveen Sripati <praveensripati@gmail.com> wrote:
>> If I see the benchmarks [1], it's always Hama against Hama. While this is
>> absolutely necessary to make sure Hama doesn't regress, it's even more
>> necessary to compare (functionality, performance, algorithms etc) Hama with
>> others.
>> Couldn't agree more with Suraj on benchmarks to benchmarks comparison.
>> Since everything is available as open source it should be possible to do a
>> comparison with the same data set with out-of-the-box software without any
>> fine tuning for different algorithms.
>> Just my 2c.
>> Praveen
>> [1] - http://wiki.apache.org/hama/Benchmarks
>> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Edward J. Yoon <edwardyoon@apache.org>wrote:
>>> and also, GraphLab, and Spark.
>>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Praveen Sripati
>>> <praveensripati@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> What advantages does Hama offer over Giraph for graph processing?
>>>> After watching the following video (http://vimeo.com/40737998) both Hama
>>>> and Giraph seems to have somewhat similar API approach for graph
>>>> processing. Both of them extend/implement a vertex class and implement
>>> the
>>>> compute method.
>>>> We can may be covert this discussion into a Wiki.
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Praveen
>>> --
>>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>>> @eddieyoon

View raw message