Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hama-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hama-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D42EC182D5 for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 08:41:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24661 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2015 08:41:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hama-dev-archive@hama.apache.org Received: (qmail 24640 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2015 08:41:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hama.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hama.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hama.apache.org Received: (qmail 24334 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2015 08:41:28 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 May 2015 08:41:28 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id B0528C0922 for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 08:41:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=googlemail.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SiWHfHxoT8JB for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 08:41:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com (mail-pa0-f46.google.com [209.85.220.46]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 15D2843CA1 for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 08:41:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pabru16 with SMTP id ru16so87768887pab.1 for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 01:40:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=q5Uxd4LQZ+AVYvaRF7iZpoD2jessUafNdgRsCFnd1iQ=; b=olpq1YhiFUhGwHX1qHBxd9fwf0tS4y/YpLEm7g5CVrTCqa6/7KjrCOavVZRytGivTf TYFhnn+4Tqgrzrak3X/BelmYSE9zpTy55RnA56OyN0AIxKxt9SqsigFNvtvRLAhgdeDe RT4lfT3mA4gpfvbci4Wh2UPBfI9NVWB4bDaZrBfgFrLsZB+wT7BhUWd1EshEdoH48FtO +h+oHAFAn0/czSpt6K4DjaMl28UKQ/JC/IphpYpA4F27sf8YX9l1a3s44MzYE66mlic9 B9OV37urcjFKZxoCkXNVkzvX/1JZZtdAFZMKeF891+4cLnt5O5F0ePolI2BB+GQq5hTN gPcg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.87.35 with SMTP id u3mr46941676pbz.127.1432629629682; Tue, 26 May 2015 01:40:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.73.198 with HTTP; Tue, 26 May 2015 01:40:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 16:40:29 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: DNN at Tencent From: Chia-Hung Lin To: dev@hama.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 That's why I am working on refactoring core module stuff : ) BSP is suitable for iterative applications and is for general purpose parallelism. So as long as the application can be expressed as iterative algorithm, ideally our framework (in terms of higher abstraction level) should have no problem for such applications. On 26 May 2015 at 16:08, Edward J. Yoon wrote: > Just FYI, http://www.vldb.org/pvldb/vol7/p1772-tencent.pdf > > According to them, they used BSP model (and additional Parameter > server) like google's distbelief. Do you think we can do this? > > > -- > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon