hama-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From JĂșlio Pires <juliocspi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: giraph (158 secs) vs hama (223 secs) on 300M edges graph
Date Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:22:26 GMT
Hi,

Interesting results!
With changes of HAMA-946 [1], the final comparation is:

Hama (160.696 seconds) and Giraph (158 seconds), right?

Thanks!

1 - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-946



2015-04-09 10:13 GMT-03:00 Edward J. Yoon <edwardyoon@apache.org>:

> Just FYI, I tested giraph using same input data on 2 node cluster.
> Tests are not enough yet but Hama is slightly slow.
>
> The main reason is that hama's graph job consists of two multi
> jobs:graph pre-partitioning and computing (I/O usage between jobs and
> launching overheads).
>
> If possible, I'll fix this issue before release 0.7. :)
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message