hama-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Edward J. Yoon (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HAMA-913) Adding Implementation of RPC
Date Thu, 07 Aug 2014 10:21:18 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-913?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14089106#comment-14089106
] 

Edward J. Yoon commented on HAMA-913:
-------------------------------------

Please see also, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-405

and I've chatted with netty guys.
 
[19:07] <edyoon> Hello. someone uploaded a netty-based asynchronous RPC implementation
for Apache Hama (Hama is a message-passing based parallel computing framework). Internally,
we bundle the messages to reduce the RPC overhead, so I want to know whether "netty-based
asynchronous RPC implementation" is fit for transferring large size of messages?
[19:08] <@normanm> edyoon yes it is
[19:08] <@normanm> edyoon for example facebook is using it for nifty which is a thrift
server on top of netty
[19:08] <@normanm> I guess the use case is kind of the same


> Adding Implementation of RPC
> ----------------------------
>
>                 Key: HAMA-913
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-913
>             Project: Hama
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: bsp core
>    Affects Versions: 0.6.4
>            Reporter: ByungSeok Min
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: core, messaging, netty
>             Fix For: 0.7.0
>
>         Attachments: HAMA-913-v01.patch, HAMA-913-v02.patch, HAMA-913-v03.patch
>
>
> The current RPC server code is too complex and there are some unnecessary code
> So, It seems good to add implementation of RPC such as netty



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Mime
View raw message