Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hama.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hama.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of clin4j@googlemail.com
 designates 209.85.220.41 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAGnSx07VYUSjvhJhN+u0=kU540K4BvmSe+JtSJ_zaPN8JwhZNw@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CA+jdVcy3qVnLGZb+6nSvPEJLrQO=pbh1p2UNVHVVOR-pOmHnqA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALis4o4Yag7NG9poyWadw+JAHNXJ48zqwz0RFhwibABdjXHsMQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+jdVcygo4326f_3gM_mSXUts6x9c=+RO7mfpaQ960W1yPxj+g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGnSx07iDYxLKonz6B+xFPKkwqF33mmpQKEnWtb4=Oq+jj8MGw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+jdVcwAzrVEe5363Y1kXP47SyUy5aDHyra4niVu71cCCHa6dQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGnSx05Ujbd-ij0xuTfgYKHE-H-LAh2vS2jd27jBuJhbvBqgbg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+jdVczTPNn-Exwt0DhZhUyqop4RHeXv8aZ0KPWz6DydDnteew@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGnSx07VYUSjvhJhN+u0=kU540K4BvmSe+JtSJ_zaPN8JwhZNw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 15:42:56 +0800
Message-ID: 
 <CA+jdVcw08O7GPJ7xPwdS5-7+gVSjonbj1M9swjn4yL2PHRo3Hg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Refactoring code
From: Chia-Hung Lin <clin4j@googlemail.com>
To: dev@hama.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Get it. Thanks!

On 30 April 2014 15:23, Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teofili@gmail.com> wrote:
> sure, I think work in progress as an effort to innovate and improve our
> current architecture and performance would be a great one, and I've seen
> wip talks in the past.
>
> Tommaso
>
>
> 2014-04-30 9:19 GMT+02:00 Chia-Hung Lin <clin4j@googlemail.com>:
>
>> Oop sorry. The submission mentioned is related to
>>
>> Maybe a chance for a submission to ApacheCon EU?
>>
>>
>> On 30 April 2014 15:10, Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teofili@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > sure, maybe in a branch, or under a sandbox directory e.g.
>> > svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hama/sandbox/core-akka
>> >
>> > Tommaso
>> >
>> >
>> > 2014-04-30 9:02 GMT+02:00 Chia-Hung Lin <clin4j@googlemail.com>:
>> >
>> >> The refactoring process is still underway. Is it appropriate to submit
>> >> something that is wip or may be changed drastically later on?
>> >>
>> >> On 30 April 2014 03:12, Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teofili@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> > I do like this approach as well, I'd be curious to try it out myself,
>> >> maybe
>> >> > in the next weeks.
>> >> > Maybe a chance for a submission to ApacheCon EU?
>> >> >
>> >> > Regards,
>> >> > Tommaso
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > 2014-04-29 17:01 GMT+02:00 Chia-Hung Lin <clin4j@googlemail.com>:
>> >> >
>> >> >> The core module are heavily refactored. And will try our best to
>> >> >> retain the original interface so that users and other modules won't
>> be
>> >> >> impacted too much. Basically the users side will still use Java code
>> >> >> because for the core module it's just interfaces/classes definition.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Please let me know if anything in terms of this.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 29 April 2014 22:24, Suraj Menon <menonsuraj5@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> > Looks like a complete refactor and with a different language ;). I
>> am
>> >> +1
>> >> >> on
>> >> >> > moving to Scala.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > -Suraj
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 6:19 AM, Chia-Hung Lin <
>> clin4j@googlemail.com
>> >> >> >wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Hi
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Recently I am working on the refactoring bsp core module. It's
>> >> >> >> basically related to HAMA-881.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> There's already some changes. If you have interested, the code is
>> at
>> >> >> >> https://github.com/chlin501
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>