hama-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hudson (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HAMA-849) No need to use sorted queue for outgoingQueue
Date Wed, 15 Jan 2014 23:46:24 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-849?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13872817#comment-13872817
] 

Hudson commented on HAMA-849:
-----------------------------

SUCCESS: Integrated in Hama-Nightly-for-Hadoop-2.x #149 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hama-Nightly-for-Hadoop-2.x/149/])
HAMA-849: No need to use sorted queue for outgoingQueue (edwardyoon: rev 1558248)
* /hama/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/hama/bsp/message/queue/SortedMemoryQueueTransfer.java


> No need to use sorted queue for outgoingQueue 
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HAMA-849
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-849
>             Project: Hama
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: bsp core, graph
>    Affects Versions: 0.6.3
>            Reporter: Edward J. Yoon
>            Assignee: Edward J. Yoon
>             Fix For: 0.7.0
>
>         Attachments: HAMA-849.patch
>
>
> Basically message transfer protocol provides senderQueue and receiverQueue separately.
Since only incoming queue should be sorted, there's no need to use sorted queue for outgoingQueue.
> In graphJobRunner case, we can use diskqueue and sortedqueue to reduce the memory usage
until sorted spilling queue is implemented.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Mime
View raw message