Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hama-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hama-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 51D7010300 for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 07:40:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9562 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2013 07:40:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hama-dev-archive@hama.apache.org Received: (qmail 9439 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2013 07:40:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hama.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hama.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hama.apache.org Received: (qmail 9254 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jul 2013 07:40:48 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 07:40:48 +0000 Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 07:40:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tommaso Teofili (JIRA)" To: dev@hama.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HAMA-742) Implement of Hama RPC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13712106#comment-13712106 ] Tommaso Teofili commented on HAMA-742: -------------------------------------- I've had a quick review of the patch and I have 2 questions: * why is Avro dependency there? It seems to me it's not used but correct me if I'm wrong * why are _DistributedCache.add/setLocalFiles(conf, files.toString());_ commented out ? > Implement of Hama RPC > ---------------------- > > Key: HAMA-742 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-742 > Project: Hama > Issue Type: Sub-task > Reporter: Edward J. Yoon > Assignee: Edward J. Yoon > Fix For: 0.6.3 > > Attachments: HAMA-742_v01.patch, HAMA-742_v02.patch > > > To solve HDFS 2.0 compatibility issue, we have to change a lot of codes for Hadoop 2.0 RPC, moreover, yarn RPC doesn't support asynchronous call directly. > Ultimately, we can pursue the performance and integrate more easily with hadoop multi-versions by having our own RPC. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira